Re: Autovacuum cancellation
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-10-26T09:32:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > /* > * Look for a blocking autovacuum. There will only ever > * be one, since the autovacuum workers are careful > * not to operate concurrently on the same table. > */ I think that's a bit unaccurate. You could have multiple autovacuum workers operating on different tables participating in a deadlock. The reason that can't happen is that autovacuum never holds a lock while waiting for another. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com