Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-10-24T01:34:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: > Now to the extent that regular commit-fests keep patch development > more closely aligned with the mainline CVS, the fest proposal might > indirectly alleviate your pain. But I'd think that snaps taken > *after* the fests would be the best for that, as they'd be closer > to what any subsequent development would be based on. The stability > argument I made doesn't seem like a problem for testing purposes, > only if someone were to try to use such a snap for production purposes > (which putting them up for archiving might encourage). > > > It might be worth applying a simple tag (but not a branch) at the end (and maybe also at the start) of each checkpoint/fest/whatever cheers andrew