Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-10-23T22:17:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>   
>> Anyway, is there anyone who thinks the "cycle the queue every 6 weeks or 2 
>> months or suitable short period" is a *bad* idea?   It might be hard to pull 
>> off, but we won't know until we try.
>>     
>
> It seems worth a try --- we can certainly abandon it easily if it
> doesn't work.
>
> Personally I feel every six weeks would be too short: we'd be talking
> only a month of work between commit-fests.  I like a two-month cycle
> partly because it wouldn't rotate relative to the calendar: we'd always
> know that the first half of every odd-numbered month, or something like
> that, is commit-fest time.
>
>
>   

+1 on both counts.

cheers

andrew