Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

> On Apr 22, 2014, at 5:07 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 04/22/2014 06:43 PM, Mark Wong wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com <mailto:jd@commandprompt.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>    On 04/22/2014 08:26 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> 
>>        I'm going away tomorrow for a few days R&R. when I'm back next
>>        week I
>>        will set up a demo client running this module. If you can have
>>        a machine
>>        prepped for this purpose by then so much the better, otherwise
>>        I will
>>        have to drag out a box I recently rescued and have been
>>        waiting for
>>        something to use it with. It's more important that it's stable
>>        (i.e.
>>        nothing else running on it) than that it's very powerful. It
>>        could be
>> 
>>        running Ubuntu or some Redhattish variant or, yes, even FreeBSD.
>> 
>> 
>>    This is best handled by Mark. Mark can you help Andrew with this?
>>    I assume we would use the DL385 with the MS70?
>> 
>> 
>> Yeah, I can help.  But let me know if Alfred's offer is preferred.
> 
> 
> I don't think they are mutually exclusive, but I'd rather start off with one machine. I would find it easiest if it were on something like CentOS6.5.
> 
> When we have that running and reporting like we want it we can add a FreeBSD server.
> 
> The idea is that these machines would be available for a long time, ideally quite a few years. We want to have them with a stable time series of performance data so that when something disturbs the performance it sticks out like a sore thumb.

Ok, centos 6.4 is on there now, I'll try to get that upgraded within a few days or so. I'll keep you posted.

Regards,
Mark