Re: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
bdrouvotAWS <bdrouvot@amazon.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Reduce the log level in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl.
- 3034dc56ef4b 16.0 landed
-
035_standby_logical_decoding: Add missing waits for replication
- 57411c82ce86 16.0 landed
-
For cascading replication, wake physical and logical walsenders separately
- e101dfac3a53 16.0 landed
-
Handle logical slot conflicts on standby
- 26669757b6a7 16.0 landed
-
Support invalidating replication slots due to horizon and wal_level
- be87200efd93 16.0 landed
-
Prevent use of invalidated logical slot in CreateDecodingContext()
- 4397abd0a2af 16.0 landed
-
Replace replication slot's invalidated_at LSN with an enum
- 15f8203a5975 16.0 landed
-
Pass down table relation into more index relation functions
- 61b313e47eb9 16.0 landed
-
Assert only valid flag bits are passed to visibilitymap_set()
- a88a18b1250b 16.0 landed
-
Remove unused _bt_delitems_delete() argument.
- dc43492e46c7 14.0 cited
-
Add xl_btree_delete optimization.
- d2e5e20e5711 13.0 cited
Hi Peter, On 8/26/21 1:35 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do > not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender > and know the content is safe. > > > > I noticed the tests added in this patch set are very slow. Here are > some of the timings: > > ... > [13:26:59] t/018_wal_optimize.pl ................ ok 13976 ms > [13:27:13] t/019_replslot_limit.pl .............. ok 10976 ms > [13:27:24] t/020_archive_status.pl .............. ok 6190 ms > [13:27:30] t/021_row_visibility.pl .............. ok 3227 ms > [13:27:33] t/022_crash_temp_files.pl ............ ok 2296 ms > [13:27:36] t/023_pitr_prepared_xact.pl .......... ok 3601 ms > [13:27:39] t/024_archive_recovery.pl ............ ok 3937 ms > [13:27:43] t/025_stuck_on_old_timeline.pl ....... ok 4348 ms > [13:27:47] t/026_standby_logical_decoding.pl .... ok 117730 ms <<< > > Is it possible to improve this? Thanks for looking at it. Once the walsender race conditions mentioned by Andres in [1] are addressed then i think that the tests should be much more faster. I'll try to have a look soon and come with a proposal to address those race conditions. Thanks Bertrand [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210802160133.uugcce5ql4m5mv5m%40alap3.anarazel.de