Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Albert Cervera i Areny <albert@nan-tic.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-08-29T22:52:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: >> I'm very strongly in favor of having this documentation. However, I think >> it might make sense to put "Contrib Modules" as a section under either >> "Reference" or "Appendices". Also, I don't think it's necessary to make >> each command option a separate subchapter, but I can see how that would be >> hard to avoid in an automated system. >> > > It's not an automated system, README files have different structures so it's > all manual work. That's why I asked how you think it should be organized. > Anyone else thinks we should put it in Reference or Appendixes? > I would far rather have a new top level heading. Something like "Standard Modules and Tools". (Please avoid the use of the word "contrib"). If not, than as a sub-chapter of "References". I don't think it belongs in the Appendixes. cheers andrew