Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-10-03T14:28:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Maybe I am missing something here, but reindex concurrently should do > 1) BEGIN > 2) Lock table in share update exlusive > 3) lock old index > 3) create new index > 4) obtain session locks on table, old index, new index > 5) commit > 6) process till newindex->insisready (no new locks) > 7) process till newindex->indisvalid (no new locks) > 8) process till !oldindex->indisvalid (no new locks) > 9) process till !oldindex->indisready (no new locks) > 10) drop all session locks > 11) lock old index exlusively which should be "invisible" now > 12) drop old index You can't drop the session locks until you're done. Consider somebody else trying to do a DROP TABLE between steps 10 and 11, for instance. regards, tom lane
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Background worker processes
- da07a1e85651 9.3.0 cited
-
Fix assorted bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- 3c84046490be 9.3.0 cited
-
Work around unportable behavior of malloc(0) and realloc(NULL, 0).
- 09ac603c36d1 9.3.0 cited
-
Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.
- beb850e1d873 9.3.0 cited