Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What would make sense to work on
>> is making the build step that strips not-officially-exported symbols
>> work on more platforms.

> Uh, well, I had some patches in the patch queue to go in that direction,
> but I thought the conclusion in that thread was that it wasn't worth it.

We currently have coverage for Linux and Darwin.  If we had coverage for
the *BSDen I would figure it was close enough ... is it possible to do
the *BSDen with a few more makefile lines, or is it too ugly?

			regards, tom lane