Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2007-05-01T21:34:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Henry B. Hotz wrote: >>>>> I would call them "gss" and "gss-sec". Or possibly "gss-enc". I think >>>>> that's a lot more clear than "gss-np" (something ending with -sec is a >>>>> giveaway) >>>> >>>> +1 >>> >>> If we settle on gss-np and gss-sec is that a good compromise? >> >> I still think the "-np" part is unclear - it's not "easily guessable >> without reading the documentation", unless you're already familiar >> with it. >> >> //Magnus > > gss-noprot and gss-prot > > gss-noenc and gss-enc Those I like better. I still think it's unnecessary, but I won't object to those :-) //Magnus