Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Cc: Matthew O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim@CommandPrompt.com>, "'Joshua D. Drake'" <jd@CommandPrompt.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-04-06T14:13:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Larry Rosenman wrote:
> It doesn't matter as far as MY box is concerned.  I use VMWare 
> extensively
> in my current $DAYJOB, and I want to be able to test/play with things 
> related
> to that as well.  The box I'm building will be using the (free) VMWare 
> Server
> as it's virtualization platform.
>
> I'd still like to hear from a Tom Lane or someone else on the project 
> with what
> X86 or X86_64 OS's we need coverage for.
>
>

VMWare Server is indeed a fine product, which I use extensively.

I am not sure what our Windows support is like for x86_64. Magnus has 
one for MSVC (for which buildfarm support is nearly done, but not 
quite). But I don't see one for MinGW. OTOH, Windows is not free (in 
either sense) and setting up a build environment there is quite a bit 
harder than on Unix platforms.

The other platform I've whined about missing for some time is HP-UX, 
especially on PA-RISC. But that's a whole different story.

cheers

andrew