Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Cc: Matthew O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim@CommandPrompt.com>, "'Joshua D. Drake'" <jd@CommandPrompt.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-04-06T14:13:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Larry Rosenman wrote: > It doesn't matter as far as MY box is concerned. I use VMWare > extensively > in my current $DAYJOB, and I want to be able to test/play with things > related > to that as well. The box I'm building will be using the (free) VMWare > Server > as it's virtualization platform. > > I'd still like to hear from a Tom Lane or someone else on the project > with what > X86 or X86_64 OS's we need coverage for. > > VMWare Server is indeed a fine product, which I use extensively. I am not sure what our Windows support is like for x86_64. Magnus has one for MSVC (for which buildfarm support is nearly done, but not quite). But I don't see one for MinGW. OTOH, Windows is not free (in either sense) and setting up a build environment there is quite a bit harder than on Unix platforms. The other platform I've whined about missing for some time is HP-UX, especially on PA-RISC. But that's a whole different story. cheers andrew