Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>, Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-10-01T21:38:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes: >> The effects don't stop propagating there, either. The decision >> not to insert the tuple must be reported up still further, so >> that the executor knows not to run any AFTER INSERT/UPDATE >> triggers and knows not to count the tuple as inserted/updated >> for the command completion report. > But what about BEFORE insert/update triggers which could insert > records too? Well, what about them? It's already possible for a later BEFORE trigger to cause the actual insertion to be suppressed, so I don't see any difference from what we have now. If a BEFORE trigger takes actions on the assumption that the insert will happen, it's busted already. Mind you, I'm not actually advocating that we do any of this ;-). I was just sketching a possible implementation approach in case someone wants to try it. regards, tom lane