Re: Tid scan improvements
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Edmund Horner <ejrh00@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-01-15T03:54:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Edmund Horner <ejrh00@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 at 07:10, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'm not entirely sure why you're bothering; surely nulltestsel is >> unrelated to what this patch is about? > I found that it made a difference with selectivity of range comparisons, > because clauselist_selectivity tries to correct for it (clausesel.c:274): Oh, I see. > I guess we could have a standalone patch to add this for all system columns? +1 regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Add TID Range Scans to support efficient scanning ranges of TIDs
- bb437f995d47 14.0 landed
-
Improve planner's selectivity estimates for inequalities on CTID.
- f7111f72d2fd 12.0 landed