Re: [HACKERS] urgent: upgraded to 8.2, getting kernel panics
Joey K. <pguser@gmail.com>
From: "CAJ CAJ" <pguser@gmail.com>
To: "postgres general" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2007-02-24T01:41:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
On 2/23/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: > > On friday we upgraded a critical backend server to postgresql 8.2 > > running on fedora core 4. > > Umm ... why that particular choice of OS? Red Hat dropped update > support for FC4 some time ago, and AFAIK the Fedora Legacy project > is not getting things done. How old is the kernel you're using? > > > At this juncture we are going to downgrade the postmaster back to 8.1 > > and see if that fixes the panics. > > Even assuming that Postgres is related to the panics, I don't think you > will find anyone maintaining that a kernel panic is not the kernel's > problem. If an application *is* able to provoke a kernel panic, the > standard description of the problem would be "critical kernel security > flaw". I vaguely remember running into spinlock problems with FC4 and it wasn't due to PostgreSQL. We didn't have database running on FC4. If you are running a critical server you should switch to atleast CentOS.