Re: ZFS and Postgresql - WASRe: Best OS for Postgres 8.2

Jignesh K. Shah <j.k.shah@sun.com>

From: Jignesh Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: ?? Ian Li <liyan82@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2007-05-09T17:49:16Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
But we still pay the penalty on WAL while writing them in the first 
place I guess .. Is there an option to disable it.. I can test how much 
is the impact I guess couple of %s but good to verify :-) )


Regards,
Jignesh


Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jignesh Shah escribió:
>
>   
>> Now comes the thing that I am still exploring
>> * Do we do checksum in WAL ? I guess we do .. Which means that we are 
>> now doing double checksumming on the data. One in ZFS and one in 
>> postgresql. ZFS does allow checksumming to be turned off (but on new 
>> blocks allocated). But of course the philosophy is where should it be 
>> done (ZFS or PostgreSQL).
>>     
>
> Checksums on WAL are not optional in Postgres, because AFAIR they are
> used to determine when it should stop recovering.
>
>