Re: ZFS and Postgresql - WASRe: Best OS for Postgres 8.2
Jignesh K. Shah <j.k.shah@sun.com>
From: Jignesh Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: ?? Ian Li <liyan82@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2007-05-09T17:49:16Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
But we still pay the penalty on WAL while writing them in the first place I guess .. Is there an option to disable it.. I can test how much is the impact I guess couple of %s but good to verify :-) ) Regards, Jignesh Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Jignesh Shah escribió: > > >> Now comes the thing that I am still exploring >> * Do we do checksum in WAL ? I guess we do .. Which means that we are >> now doing double checksumming on the data. One in ZFS and one in >> postgresql. ZFS does allow checksumming to be turned off (but on new >> blocks allocated). But of course the philosophy is where should it be >> done (ZFS or PostgreSQL). >> > > Checksums on WAL are not optional in Postgres, because AFAIR they are > used to determine when it should stop recovering. > >