Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <all@adv.magwien.gv.at>, Mario Weilguni *EXTERN* <mweilguni@sime.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-03-13T15:38:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Albe Laurenz wrote:
>> A fix could be either that the server checks escape sequences for
>> validity
>>
>
> This strikes me as essential. If the db has a certain encoding ISTM we
> are promising that all the text data is valid for that encoding.
>
> The question in my mind is how we help people to recover from the fact
> that we haven't done that.
Is this any different than the issues of moving 8.0.x to 8.1 UTF8? Where
we had to use iconv?
Joshua D. Drake
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/