Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-10-07T16:32:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On October 7, 2021 8:49:57 AM PDT, Tom Lane >I'm also kind of unclear on why we need to do anything about this >in the community version. If someone has forked PG and changed >APIs to the extent that extensions are unlikely to work, there's >not much stopping them from also making the two-line change >to fmgr.h that would be needed to guarantee that different magic >struct contents are needed. I can see two reasons. First, it'd probably allow stock pg to generate a better error message when confronted with such a module. Second, there's some value in signaling forks that they should change (or think about changing), that field. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Commits
-
Add ABI extra field to fmgr magic block
- d6d1dfcc99e3 15.0 landed