Re: Querying distinct values from a large table
Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Igor Lobanov <ilobanov@swsoft.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2007-01-30T14:11:48Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 15:33 +0600, Igor Lobanov wrote: > >> explain analyze select distinct a, b from tbl >> >> EXPLAIN ANALYZE output is: >> >> Unique (cost=500327.32..525646.88 rows=1848 width=6) (actual >> time=52719.868..56126.356 rows=5390 loops=1) >> -> Sort (cost=500327.32..508767.17 rows=3375941 width=6) (actual >> time=52719.865..54919.989 rows=3378864 loops=1) >> Sort Key: a, b >> -> Seq Scan on tbl (cost=0.00..101216.41 rows=3375941 >> width=6) (actual time=16.643..20652.610 rows=3378864 loops=1) >> Total runtime: 57307.394 ms > > All your time is in the sort, not in the SeqScan. > > Increase your work_mem. Well, even if the sort was instant it's only going to get him down to 20secs. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd