Re: Autovacuum Improvements
Matthew T. O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net>
From: Matthew O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net>
To: Glen Parker <glenebob@nwlink.com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2006-12-20T01:52:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Glen Parker wrote: >> That really seems like something that, if it's powerful, would also be >> very complicated. If the autovacuum system could just call a user >> defined function, all the complexity could be dropped back into the >> admin's lap (which is fine with me :-). > > I have a quote by Larry Wall about something similar: > > "In fact, the basic problem with Perl 5's subroutines is that they're > not crufty enough, so the cruft leaks out into user-defined code > instead, by the Conservation of Cruft Principle." > (Larry Wall, Apocalypse 6) > > With the system described above, you can have it very simple by just not > configuring anything. Or you can have a very complex scenario involving > holidays and weekends and off-hours and "the two hours of the month when > you do all the nasty stuff" by doing a very elaborate and complicated > setup. Or you could have a middle ground just defining "off hours" > (weekends and nights) which would be just a couple of commands. I would go one step further and suggest that when the maintenance window system gets completed we give it a default setup of midnight to 6AM or something like that.