Re: SPITupleTable members missing in docs

Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:
> To take into account Tom's comment, I'd suggest a middle ground by 
> commenting a public and private part explicitely in the struct, something 
> like:

>    typedef struct {
>      /* PUBLIC members to be used by callers ... */
>      ...
>      ...
>      /* PRIVATE members, not intended for external usage ... */
>      ...
>    } ... ;

One problem is that the members we've retroactively decided are "public"
are in the middle of the struct :-(.

But it occurs to me that there's no good reason we couldn't re-order the
members, as long as we only do so on HEAD and not in released versions.
That would make it a bit less inconsistent and easier to add labels
such as you suggest.

> Note: I'm probaly not a member of the pgdoc list, so the delivery may fail 
> there.

FYI, I believe the current policy is that as long as you're subscribed
to at least one PG list you can post to any of them.

			regards, tom lane