Re: Postgres server crash
Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Russell Smith <mr-russ@pws.com.au>
Cc: "Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-11-16T10:48:45Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Russell Smith wrote: > Craig A. James wrote: >> Questions: >> 1. Any idea what happened and how I can avoid this? It's a *big* >> problem. >> 2. Why didn't the database recover? Why are there two processes >> that couldn't be killed? I'm guessing it didn't recover *because* there were two processes that couldn't be killed. Responsibility for that falls to the operating-system. I've seen it most often with faulty drivers or hardware that's being communicated with/written to. However, see below. >> 3. Where did the "signal 9" come from? (Nobody but me ever logs >> in to the server machine.) >> > I would guess it's the linux OOM if you are running linux. If not, it means the server is hacked or haunted. Something outside PG issued a kill -9 and the OOM killer is the prime suspect I'd say. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd