Re: [HACKERS] drop if exists remainder

Jim C. Nasby wrote:

 

>> Important as you are, "one swallow does not make a summer".
>>     
>
> On the other hand, unless we want the lists filling up with a bunch of
> +1 posts, it's probably better to assume that unless someone objects a
> patch would be accepted.
>   

What happened was that Tom objected to (or at least queried the need 
for) the patch on the grounds that it was bloat that nobody had asked 
for. And when I asked I wasn't exactly deluged with requests to commit, 
so I concluded that it was not generally wanted. Since then I have had 
probably 10 requests for it, so I am now going to work to update it and 
will post a revised patch.

cheers

andrew