Thread
Commits
-
Clean test_rls_hooks module
- c97e4bdcb142 15.0 landed
-
clean up test_rls_hooks module
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2022-03-23T13:31:04Z
Over at [1] Mark Dilger got led astray because he used src/test/modules/test_rls_hooks as a template for his new test module. It looks like that module was created with some over eager copying of another test module, but it has a couple of things wrong with it. . it isn't an extension, so the Makefile shouldn't have an EXTENSION entry, and there shouldn't be a .control file . it doesn't need to be preloaded so there is no requirement for a special config, nor for corresponding REGRESS_OPTS and NO_INSTALLCHECK lines in the Makefile. Here's a patch to fix those things. cheers andrew [1] https://postgr.es/m/47F87A0E-C0E5-43A6-89F6-D403F2B45175@enterprisedb.com -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
-
Re: clean up test_rls_hooks module
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2022-03-23T14:07:06Z
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Here's a patch to fix those things. Seems reasonable to me, except that I think I'd leave the formatting of the OBJS macro alone. IIRC, Andres or someone went around and made all of those follow this one-file-per-line style some time ago. regards, tom lane
-
Re: clean up test_rls_hooks module
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-03-23T15:45:11Z
Hi, On 2022-03-23 10:07:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > Here's a patch to fix those things. > > Seems reasonable to me, except that I think I'd leave the formatting > of the OBJS macro alone. IIRC, Andres or someone went around and > made all of those follow this one-file-per-line style some time ago. Yea. merge conflicts are considerably rarer that way, and a heck of a lot easier to deal with when they occur. Greetings, Andres Freund