Re: pg_ctl and port number detection

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-18T23:02:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> pg_ctl.c::test_postmaster_connection() has some fragile code that tries
> to detect the server port number by looking in the pg_ctl -o string,

It may be fragile, but it works; or at least I've not heard complaints
about it lately.

> I think a simpler solution would be to look in postmaster.pid:
> pg_ctl already knows the data directory.  If the file is missing, the
> server is not running.  If the file exists, the first number on the last
> line, divided by 1000, is the port number.

That's somewhere between fragile and outright wrong.

			regards, tom lane