Re: pg_ctl and port number detection
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-18T23:02:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > pg_ctl.c::test_postmaster_connection() has some fragile code that tries > to detect the server port number by looking in the pg_ctl -o string, It may be fragile, but it works; or at least I've not heard complaints about it lately. > I think a simpler solution would be to look in postmaster.pid: > pg_ctl already knows the data directory. If the file is missing, the > server is not running. If the file exists, the first number on the last > line, divided by 1000, is the port number. That's somewhere between fragile and outright wrong. regards, tom lane