Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core
Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-08-16T16:16:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I think you should take a closer look at PL/Java for the following reasons: > > 1. The number of followers of the Java language is extremely high and > increasing. > 2. Oracle and DB2 offers Java as a procedural language. You make > transisitions easy. > 3. There's a SQL standard for the mapping between the SQL and Java > language. > 4. Middle-tier code is often written in Java and can often be moved to > functions and stored procedures without a rewrite. > 5. PL/Java already provide both trusted and untrusted language handlers. > 6. PL/Java has a community of over 70 members and increasing. > 7. PL/Java has no license issue. > 8. The author of PL/Java would be happy to maintain it in core. These are all very good reasons. I would honestly have to know more about how PL/Java works to make a decision. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Regards, > Thomas Hallgren > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/