Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com>
From: Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com>
To: jd@commandprompt.com
Cc: Jeffrey Melloy <jmelloy@visualdistortion.org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Matthew Terenzio <matt@jobsforge.com>, PgSQL General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2005-10-16T21:05:17Z
Lists: pgsql-general
Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>But what if they came in sideways and bought Command Prompt? >> >> > >Well then I would be sitting on a beach in New Zealend with an umbrella >drink :) > > > >> (As an >>example.) You could do a lot more to destroy PostgreSQL's market in the >>business world by destroying the various support mechanisms. Your >>business is much closer to eating their lunch than PostgreSQL itself. >> >> > >That is a farily good point but one of the beautiful things about Open >Source is that even if they bought Command Prompt, they would also have >to buy Pervasive and EnterpriseDB and GreenPlum and SRA. > >And then -- by doing so they are just opening the market for a new set >of companies to start supporting PostgreSQL. > > > >>So what if they bought Command Prompt (or someone else like it) and then >>cut it off at the knees? No one ever accused Larry Ellison of being >>dumb ... different strategies for different opponents. >> >> > >No, Larry isn't dumb. You don't get to be the second richest man in the >world by being dumb. However he is very strategic and I don't see (at >this point) a strategic reason to attack PostgreSQL via Oracle. > > I don't think that PostgreSQL is really on Oracle's radar at the moment. >PostgreSQL at this point is actually a good value add to the Oracle >proposition. In 5 years we are probably going to be a immediate direct >threat but not right now. > > Note that it was a few years ago that MySQL first popped up on Oracle's radar screen enough for them to add migration tools helping people move from MySQL to Oracle. I don't see such tools available currently for PostgreSQL to Oracle migrations at the moment. So I suspect that we are still seen as the little guy :-) The difference is that while we have a smaller number of large users, MySQL has a larger number of smaller users so they technically have better market share numbers *and* they have better plublicity. Best Wishes, Chris Travers Metatron Technology Consulting