Re: distributed performance testing
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2005-08-13T22:41:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: >Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > >>Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make >>constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would >>create a branch called "test-set-yyyy-mm-dd" or some such, make your >>changes there, add a test script under some well known name, and commit >>the branch. >> >> > >This seems a pretty unconvincing argument for SVN ... we could perfectly >well do that in CVS, no? > > > > You could well be right. And I should know better than to engage in speculation like that and possibly cause us to be inundated by proponents of SCMfoo, most of whom will never write a line of code for postgres let alone ever have to commit anything ;-) Pardon my weakness. cheers andrew