Re: signed short fd
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: pgsql@mohawksoft.com
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-03-14T21:05:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
pgsql@mohawksoft.com wrote: >>pgsql@mohawksoft.com writes: >> >> >>>That is hardly anything that I would feel comfortable with. Lets break >>>this down into all the areas that are ambiguous: >>> >>> >>There isn't anything ambiguous about this, nor is it credible that there >>are implementations that don't follow the intent of the spec. >> >> > >How do you know the intent of the spec? I have seen no meta discussion >about the behavior of the file descriptor integer returned from open. The >Steven's book makes no such assumptions, and the steven's book (Advanced >Programming in the UNIX Environment) is what people reference. > > > > > My copy of APUE says on page 49: "The file descriptor returned by open is the lowest numbered unused descriptor. This is used by some applications to open a new file on standard input, standard output, or standard error." Unless someone can show there's an actual problem this discussion seems quite pointless. cheers andrew