Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible
- 775a06d44c04 18.0 landed
-
Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins
- 627d63419e22 18.0 landed
-
Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP
- 5bba0546eecb 18.0 landed
-
Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()
- d4d11940df94 18.0 landed
-
Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's
- ae4569161a27 18.0 landed
-
Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching
- d4378c0005e6 18.0 landed
-
Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample
- 2af75e117478 17.0 landed
-
Transform OR clauses to ANY expression
- 72bd38cc99a1 17.0 landed
-
MergeAttributes code deduplication
- 64444ce071f6 17.0 cited
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
-
Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.
- 25a9e54d2db3 14.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
-
Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.
- b310b6e31ce5 9.1.0 cited
-
Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,
- 9888192fb773 8.0.0 cited
Attachments
- or_patch_changes.diff (text/x-patch) patch
- v8.2-Replace-OR-clause-to-ANY-expressions.patch (text/x-patch) patch v8
On 06.11.2023 16:51, Alena Rybakina wrote: > I also support this approach. I have almost finished writing a patch > that fixes the first problem related to the quadratic complexity of > processing expressions by adding a hash table. > > I also added a check: if the number of groups is equal to the number > of OR expressions, we assume that no expressions need to be converted > and interrupt further execution. > > Now I am trying to fix the last problem in this patch: three tests > have indicated a problem related to incorrect conversion. I don't > think it can be serious, but I haven't figured out where the mistake > is yet. > > I added log like that: ERROR: unrecognized node type: 0. I fixed this issue and added some cosmetic refactoring. The changes are presented in the or_patch_changes.diff file. -- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres Professional