Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>

From: Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>, Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>, teodor@sigaev.ru, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-11-10T09:20:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible

  2. Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins

  3. Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP

  4. Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()

  5. Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's

  6. Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching

  7. Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample

  8. Transform OR clauses to ANY expression

  9. MergeAttributes code deduplication

  10. SEARCH and CYCLE clauses

  11. Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.

  12. Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.

  13. Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.

  14. Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,

Attachments

On 06.11.2023 16:51, Alena Rybakina wrote:
> I also support this approach. I have almost finished writing a patch 
> that fixes the first problem related to the quadratic complexity of 
> processing expressions by adding a hash table.
>
> I also added a check: if the number of groups is equal to the number 
> of OR expressions, we assume that no expressions need to be converted 
> and interrupt further execution.
>
> Now I am trying to fix the last problem in this patch: three tests 
> have indicated a problem related to incorrect conversion. I don't 
> think it can be serious, but I haven't figured out where the mistake 
> is yet.
>
> I added log like that: ERROR:  unrecognized node type: 0.

I fixed this issue and added some cosmetic refactoring.

The changes are presented in the or_patch_changes.diff file.

-- 
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional