Re: SURVEY: who is running postgresql on 8 or more CPUs?

Dirk Lutzebäck <lutzeb@aeccom.com>

From: Dirk Lutzebäck <lutzeb@aeccom.com>
To: Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-06-02T12:28:12Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Hi Dawid,

postgresql is open source and we also want it to be used in high 
performance areas. What's wrong with people telling on which machines 
they use it? I don't care about business details but techinal details 
would be quite interesting. In the end it is interesting to know how you 
need to tune postgresql on high end machines and how well they perform 
on the different highend platforms. This is meant to be more a field 
study and not a benchmark. We know that Opteron performs well but what 
are people actually using in high performance areas? Does postgresql run 
on an E10000? Who did it?

Regards,

Dirk

Dawid Kuroczko wrote:

>On 6/2/05, Dirk Lutzebäck <lutzeb@aeccom.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>I just got one reply for this survey. Is almost nobody using postgresql
>>on 8+ machines?
>>    
>>
>
>My guess is when someone is using PostgreSQL on 8+ machine, she's
>in highly competitive (or sensitive) market and either cannot give
>company's work details to everyone or simply doesn't want to.
>
>Probably if you asked 'I am thinking about buying 8-way Opteron
>box, does PostgreSQL have problems with such hardware' you
>would get a response.
>
>But surveys are awfully close to statistics and many people simply
>doesn't like them.  (They say that 46.7% of statisticts are just made
>up ;-)).
>
>   Regards,
>      Dawid
>  
>

-- 
Dirk Lutzebäck <lutzeb@aeccom.com> Tel +49.30.5362.1635 Fax .1638
CTO AEC/communications GmbH, Berlin, Germany, http://www.aeccom.com