Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
From: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-05-25T16:52:01Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
On 5/25/20 6:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> writes:
>> On 5/25/20 3:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> I looked into this (changing the return types of date_part()/extract()
>>> from float8 to numeric).
>
>> I think what would be better is to have a specific date_part function
>> for each part and have extract translate to the appropriate one.
>
> Doesn't really work for upwards compatibility with existing views,
> which will have calls to date_part(text, ...) embedded in them.
>
> Actually, now that I think about it, changing the result type of
> date_part() is likely to be problematic anyway for such cases.
> It's not going to be good if pg_upgrade's dump/restore of a view
> results in a new output column type; especially if it's a
> materialized view.
>
> So maybe what we'd have to do is leave date_part() alone for
> legacy compatibility, and invent new functions that the extract()
> syntax would now be translated to.
I'm sorry, I wasn't clear. I was suggesting adding new functions while
also keeping the current generic function. So exactly what you say in
that last paragraph.
Although <extract expression> has a fixed list of constant parts,
date_part() allows the part to be variable. So we need to keep it
anyway for cases like this contrived example:
SELECT date_part(p, now())
FROM UNNEST(ARRAY['epoch', 'year', 'second']) AS u (p)
> While at it, maybe we could
> fix things so that the syntax reverse-lists the same way instead
> of injecting Postgres-isms...
I'm not sure what this means.
--
Vik Fearing
Commits
-
Fix inconsistent equalfuncs.c behavior for FuncCall.funcformat.
- a65e9f3f1405 14.0 landed
-
Doc: fix discussion of how to get real Julian Dates.
- f6171e6843f0 9.6.22 landed
- c93f8f3b8d3b 14.0 landed
- 824df1cccb74 12.7 landed
- 7cd542023056 11.12 landed
- 7bbcfb4d584d 13.3 landed
- 56e234b6aff9 10.17 landed
-
Doc: document EXTRACT(JULIAN ...), improve Julian Date explanation.
- ec5bab9217cd 13.3 landed
- b391db4943dc 9.6.22 landed
- b230618ce875 12.7 landed
- 79a5928ebcb7 14.0 landed
- 64d617de3c59 10.17 landed
- 4b610547c27a 11.12 landed
-
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric
- a2da77cdb466 14.0 landed
-
Improve our ability to regurgitate SQL-syntax function calls.
- 40c24bfef925 14.0 landed
-
Add more tests for EXTRACT of date type
- 540612fa469e 14.0 landed
-
Expose internal function for converting int64 to numeric
- 0aa8f764088e 14.0 landed
-
Change floating-point output format for improved performance.
- 02ddd499322a 12.0 cited