Re: performance hit for replication

>So, my question is this: My server currently works great, performance wise.
>I need to add fail-over capability, but I'm afraid that introducing a
>stressful task such as replication will hurt my server's performance. Is
>there any foundation to my fears? I don't need to replicate the archived log
>data because I can easily restore that in a separate step from the nightly
>backup if disaster occurs. Also, my database load is largely selects. My
>application works great with PostgreSQL 7.3 and 7.4, but I'm currently using
>7.3. 
>
>I'm eager to hear your thoughts and experiences,
>  
>
Well with replicator you are going to take a pretty big hit initially 
during the full
sync but then you could use batch replication and only replicate every 
2-3 hours.

I am pretty sure Slony has similar capabilities.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake