Re: Implementing RESET CONNECTION ...

Tom Lane wrote:

> Fair point, but you could make the same argument against *any* side
> effect of RESET CONNECTION.  You're just complaining about PREPARE
> because you can see immediately where that breaks JDBC.  Anything that
> any driver does to set up per-connection state the way it wants will
> be equally vulnerable.

Yes, exactly.

> Perhaps RESET CONNECTION should be a protocol-level operation instead
> of a SQL command?  That would prevent user-level code from causing it
> without the driver knowing.

I just suggested as much in another email (our emails crossed).

-O