Re: Anyone familiar with Apple Xserve RAID
Alan Stange <stange@rentec.com>
From: Alan Stange <stange@rentec.com>
To: Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-08-26T20:01:15Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Doug McNaught wrote: >Kevin Barnard <kbarnard@speedfc.com> writes: > > > >> Actually you are both are right and wrong. The XRaid uses >> FibreChannel to communicate to the host machine(s). The Raid >> controller is a FibreChannel controller. After that there is a >> FibreChannel to UltraATA conversion for each drive, separate ATA bus >> for each drive. >> What I am curious about is if this setup gets around ATA fsync >> problems, where the drive reports the write before it is actually >> performed. >> >> > >Good point. > >(a) The FC<->ATA unit hopefully has a battery-backed cache, which > would make the whole thing more robust against power loss. >(b) Since Apple is the vendor for the drive units, they can buy ATA > drives that don't lie about cache flushes. Whether they do or not > is definitely a question. ;) > > FYI: http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/pdf/tn1040.pdf a tech note on write cache flushing. A bit dated now, but perhaps some other tech note from Apple has more recent information. -- Alan