Re: BUG #18348: Inconsistency with EXTRACT([field] from INTERVAL);
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Cc: Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>,
Michael Bondarenko <work.michael.2956@gmail.com>,
pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, dgrowleyml@gmail.com
Date: 2024-02-19T17:22:33Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v2-interval-extract-docs-fixes.patch (text/x-diff) patch v2
jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> writes: > 9.9.1. EXTRACT, date_part > hour field description as > ` > The hour field (0–23) > ` > Do we need to update for the EXTRACT(INTERVAL) case? Yeah, probably. I did a bit more wordsmithing too. Here's a rolled-up patch. regards, tom lane
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix extraction of week and quarter fields from intervals.
- 6be39d77a70d 18.0 landed
-
Doc: improve explanation of type interval, especially extract().
- fcd210d496da 17.0 landed
- ebf52e9b7532 14.12 landed
- eb1d008a7a18 13.15 landed
- 6d03e8109250 15.7 landed
- 3ad319b8cad4 16.3 landed