Horton

Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-04-20T23:39:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-04-20 19:23:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> or are the HANDLEs in a Windows WaitEventSet not inheritable
>> resources?

> I think we have control over that. According to
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724466(v=vs.85).aspx
> CreateProcess() has to be called with bInheritHandles = true (which we
> do for backends), and SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES.bInheritHandle has to be true
> too.  The latter we already only do for InitSharedLatch(), but not for
> InitLatch(), nor for the WSACreateEvent's created for sockets - those
> apparently can never be inherited.

> So that kind of sounds like it should be doable.

Ah, good.  I'll add a comment about that and press on.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Cope with glibc too old to have epoll_create1().

  2. Make latch.c more paranoid about child-process cases.

  3. Allow multiple bgworkers to be launched per postmaster iteration.

  4. Revert "Use pselect(2) not select(2), if available, to wait in postmaster's loop."

  5. Use pselect(2) not select(2), if available, to wait in postmaster's loop.

  6. Run the postmaster's signal handlers without SA_RESTART.

  7. Fix postmaster's handling of fork failure for a bgworker process.

  8. Partially revert commit 536d47bd9d5fce8d91929bee3128fa1d08dbcc57.

  9. Avoid depending on non-POSIX behavior of fcntl(2).

  10. Remove long-obsolete catering for platforms without F_SETFD/FD_CLOEXEC.