Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
From: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope@jackdb.com>,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>,
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>,
"Moon,
Insung" <Moon_Insung_i3@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-11-02T12:24:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revamp the WAL record format.
- 2c03216d8311 9.5.0 cited
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:44 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Right. The 8k page LSN changes each time the page is modified, and the > > is part of the page nonce. > > What about hint bit changes? > > I think even with wal_log_hints=on, it's not the case that *every* > change to hint bits results in an LSN change. Change to hint bits does not result in LSN change in the case I described here https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/28452.1572443058%40antos but I consider this a bug (BTW, I discovered this problem when thinking about the use of LSN as encryption IV). Do you mean any other case? If LSN does not get changed, then the related full-page image WAL record is not guaranteed to be on disk during crash recovery. Thus if page checksum is invalid due to torn-page write, there's now WAL record to fix the page. -- Antonin Houska Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com