Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness
Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Date: 2004-10-10T09:25:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > I'm hoping that some of you can shed some light on this. > > I've been trying to peg the "sweet spot" for shared memory using OSDL's > equipment. With Jan's new ARC patch, I was expecting that the desired > amount of shared_buffers to be greatly increased. This has not turned out to > be the case. > > The first test series was using OSDL's DBT2 (OLTP) test, with 150 > "warehouses". All tests were run on a 4-way Pentium III 700mhz 3.8GB RAM > system hooked up to a rather high-end storage device (14 spindles). Tests > were on PostgreSQL 8.0b3, Linux 2.6.7. I'd like to see these tests running using the cpu affinity capability in order to oblige a backend to not change CPU during his life, this could drastically increase the cache hit. Regards Gaetano Mendola