Re: Possible Bug in pg_upgrade
Dave Byrne <dbyrne@mdb.com>
From: Dave Byrne <dbyrne@mdb.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Date: 2011-08-10T22:17:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- pg_upgrade_tmp.patch (application/octet-stream)
Attached is a patch that skips orphaned temporary relations in pg_upgrade if they are lingering around. It works for 9.0 -> 9.1 upgrades, however I wasn't able to tell when pg_class.relistemp was added so if it was unavailable in versions prior to 9.0 an additional check will have to be added. Thanks Dave Byrne -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:29 PM To: Dave Byrne Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Bruce Momjian Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible Bug in pg_upgrade Dave Byrne <dbyrne@mdb.com> writes: > Beginning with commit 002c105a0706bd1c1e939fe0f47ecdceeae6c52d > pg_upgrade will fail if there are orphaned temp tables in the current > database with the message 'old and new databases "postgres" have a > different number of relations' > On line 41 of pg_upgrade/info.c pg_upgrade checks that the number of > relations are the same but includes orphaned temp tables in the comparison. > Is this expected behavior? Seems like an oversight. regards, tom lane