Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

曾文旌 (义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>

From: 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>
To: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: "Prabhat Sahu" <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Tomas Vondra" <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, "Konstantin Knizhnik" <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia@taobao.com>, Cai, Le <le.cai@alibaba-inc.com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong.xsc@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: 2020-03-09T16:31:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. PageAddItemExtended(): Add LP_UNUSED assertion.

  2. Remove temporary files after backend crash

  3. Fix comment in indexing.c

  4. Fix failure to ignore leftover temp tables after a server crash.


> 2020年3月9日 下午10:37,tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> 写道:
> 
> On 3/6/20 12:35 PM, 曾文旌(义从) wrote:
>> Fixed in global_temporary_table_v17-pg13.patch
> 
> I observed that , we do support 'global temp' keyword with views
> 
> postgres=# create or replace  global temp view v1 as select 5;
> CREATE VIEW
I think we should not support global temp view.
Fixed in global_temporary_table_v18-pg13.patch.



Wenjing


> 
> but if we take the dump( using pg_dumpall) then it only display 'create view'
> 
> look like we are skipping it ?
> 
> -- 
> regards,tushar
> EnterpriseDB  https://www.enterprisedb.com/
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company