Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-07-11T23:06:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes: > Is it possible to re-add amgettuple to GIN, and just set the cost high > so it's not chosen by the planner? Or is there some reason this is > fundamentally a bad idea (or won't work at all)? We wouldn't have deleted it if it were practical to make it work. regards, tom lane