Re: WIP: generalized index constraints

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-07-11T23:06:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> Is it possible to re-add amgettuple to GIN, and just set the cost high
> so it's not chosen by the planner? Or is there some reason this is
> fundamentally a bad idea (or won't work at all)?

We wouldn't have deleted it if it were practical to make it work.

			regards, tom lane