Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-05-05T04:00:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I remember going through this.  Other backends will use pg_subtrans to
> know what transactions are in progress. They have to do the standard
> lookups to find the status of the parent transaction.  The backend-local
> list of xids is needed so the commit can clean up those subtransaction
> xids so that later transactions don't have to use pg_subtrans.

Is there some solution whereby the common case (99.999% of transactions 
won't be subtransactoins) is fast, and the uncommon case of being in a 
subtransaction is slower?

Chris