Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-05-05T04:00:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I remember going through this. Other backends will use pg_subtrans to > know what transactions are in progress. They have to do the standard > lookups to find the status of the parent transaction. The backend-local > list of xids is needed so the commit can clean up those subtransaction > xids so that later transactions don't have to use pg_subtrans. Is there some solution whereby the common case (99.999% of transactions won't be subtransactoins) is fast, and the uncommon case of being in a subtransaction is slower? Chris