Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions

"David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com> writes:
> On Sep 15, 2023, at 20:36, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think that that indicates that you're putting the info in the
>> wrong place.  Perhaps the right answer is to insert something
>> more explicit in section 11.2, which is the first place where
>> we really spend any effort discussing what can be indexed.

> Fair enough. How ’bout this?

After thinking about it for awhile, I think we need some more
discursive explanation of what's allowed, perhaps along the lines
of the attached.  (I still can't shake the feeling that this is
duplicative; but I can't find anything comparable until you get
into the weeds in Section V.)

I put the new text at the end of section 11.1, but perhaps it
belongs a little further up in that section; it seems more
important than some of the preceding paras.

			regards, tom lane