Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Matthew T. O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net>
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>
To: Paul Thomas <paul@tmsl.demon.co.uk>
Cc: Nick Barr <nicky@chuckie.co.uk>, "pgsql-performance @ postgresql . org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-04-21T18:57:16Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Paul Thomas wrote: > Looks like he's using the default postgresql.conf settings in which > case I'm not suprised at pg looking so slow. His stated use of foreign > keys invalidates the tests anyway as MyISAM tables don't support FKs > so we're probably seeing FK check overheads in pg that are simply > ignore by MySQL. In an honest test, MySQL should be reported as > failing those tests. Either failures, or they should not have been using MyISAM, they should have used the table format that supports FK's. This is just not apples to apples.