Re: knngist patch support
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
From: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, tomas@tuxteam.de, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>, "Ragi Y. Burhum" <rburhum@gmail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-02-11T14:51:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> In my understanding >> this was always enough to submit code. User's documentation is depend on >> discussion and review and can be added later >> before releasing beta. > > Several people have said this lately, but it doesn't match what I've > seen of our practice over the last year and a half; Perhaps the confusion is that we often say not to worry about the quality of the English in the documentation. That's because it's easy for a reviewer to fix up the English but not so easy to figure out what you intend the behaviour to be. -- greg