Re: knngist patch support

Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>

From: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, tomas@tuxteam.de, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>, "Ragi Y. Burhum" <rburhum@gmail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-02-11T14:51:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In my understanding
>> this was always enough to submit code. User's documentation is depend on
>> discussion and review and can be added later
>> before releasing beta.
>
> Several people have said this lately, but it doesn't match what I've
> seen of our practice over the last year and a half;

Perhaps the confusion is that we often say not to worry about the
quality of the English in the documentation. That's because it's easy
for a reviewer to fix up the English but not so easy to figure out
what you intend the behaviour to be.

-- 
greg