Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
From: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-15T19:38:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > You agree there should be two phases? > I don't understand this repeated suggestion of "phases". Nobody's every suggested that we would refuse to add new features to HS after the initial commit or the 8.5 release. Of course there should be later features if you or anyone else is interested in working on them. Or are asking whether we should commit it before it's a usable subset of the functionality? Personally I am in favour of earlier more fine-grained commits but I think the horse has left the stable on that one. We have a usable subset of the functionality in this patch already, don't we? -- greg