Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Ярослав Пашинский <yarik97.6@gmail.com>, Postgres bugs <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-19T15:13:52Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > There was a typo in one of my previous messages. What I was referring > to is aaa3aedd. Ah, I was just about to ask what the heck aaaef7a referred to. Given the evidence that there's a problem, I agree with reverting that. I'd suggest keeping the cosmetic rename of the function, but we have to put back the Windows-doesn't-HAVE_WORKING_LINK logic. Grepping in the v12 branch, I find a second use of HAVE_WORKING_LINK in contrib/pg_standby. But that seems to be in a non-WIN32 code path, so I don't think putting that back is necessary. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix concurrency issues with WAL segment recycling on Windows
- 78c24e97dd18 13.3 landed
- 909b449e00fc 14.0 landed