Re: subversion vs cvs
David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>
From: David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-03-24T19:40:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote: > I've had plenty of pain with cvs in terms of directories not being > first-class etc .. but I don't really contribute to pgsql so you guys > probably don't have the same experience. > > I was just curious as it looks like eventually subversion (or arch :-) > will be an alternative to cvs. Eventually it (either subversion, or arch, or something else) will. You just have to be patient :-) The movement will be very slow, we'll probably see Apache 1.3.x disappear first before we see CVS disappear. It _is_ frustrating to have to use something new, especially something so frequently used like source control tool. -- dave