Re: subversion vs cvs

David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>

From: David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-03-24T19:40:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> I've had plenty of pain with cvs in terms of directories not being
> first-class etc .. but I don't really contribute to pgsql so you guys
> probably don't have the same experience. 
> 
> I was just curious as it looks like eventually subversion (or arch :-)
> will be an alternative to cvs. 

Eventually it (either subversion, or arch, or something else) will. You 
just have to be patient :-) The movement will be very slow, we'll 
probably see Apache 1.3.x disappear first before we see CVS disappear.

It _is_ frustrating to have to use something new, especially something 
so frequently used like source control tool.

-- 
dave