Horton

Re: pgsql: Remove unused wait events.

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <akapila@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-10-25T17:39:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> Since this will cause integer values to have different textual enum value
> representations in 14 and 15+, do we want to skip two numbers by assigning the
> next wait event the integer value of WAIT_EVENT_WAL_WRITE incremented by three?
> Or enum integer reuse not something we guarantee against across major versions?

We require a recompile across major versions.  I don't see a reason why
this particular enum needs more stability than any other one.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Revert "Remove unused wait events."

  2. Remove unused wait events.

  3. Add support for streaming to built-in logical replication.