Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
ivan.kush@tantorlabs.com
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
meson: Fix install-quiet after clean
- a9ffb35274fb 18.0 landed
- 4ae03be54734 19 (unreleased) landed
-
oauth: Run Autoconf tests with correct compiler flags
- 3d23f68c5529 18.0 landed
- 990571a08b66 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Link libpq with libdl if the platform needs that.
- 4df477153a6b 19 (unreleased) landed
- 7bd752c1fb8e 18.0 landed
-
Doc: correct spelling of meson switch.
- 3faac9d14063 16.9 landed
- 766d2e673342 17.5 landed
- ac557793d478 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Correct SSL dependency for libpq-oauth.a
- 3db68212a393 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Fix Autoconf build on macOS
- 4ea1254f35b2 18.0 cited
-
oauth: Move the builtin flow into a separate module
- b0635bfda053 18.0 landed
-
Remove a stray "pgrminclude" annotation
- 764d501d24ba 18.0 cited
-
oauth: Simplify copy of PGoauthBearerRequest
- 1cf4c56480f8 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Improve validator docs on interruptibility
- 873c0fd67872 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Disallow synchronous DNS in libcurl
- d7e40845f923 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Fix postcondition for set_timer on macOS
- 434dbf6907ec 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Use IPv4-only issuer in oauth_validator tests
- 8d9d5843b55f 18.0 landed
-
Work around OAuth/EVFILT_TIMER quirk on NetBSD.
- c301a0a74a8a 18.0 landed
-
oauth: Fix incorrect const markers in struct
- 03366b61dfe5 18.0 landed
-
Add missing entry to oauth_validator test .gitignore
- 2c53dec7f440 18.0 landed
-
cirrus: Temporarily fix libcurl link error
- 9d9a71002a1c 18.0 landed
-
Add support for OAUTHBEARER SASL mechanism
- b3f0be788afc 18.0 landed
-
libpq: Handle asynchronous actions during SASL
- a99a32e43ed7 18.0 landed
-
require_auth: prepare for multiple SASL mechanisms
- f8d8581ed882 18.0 landed
-
Move PG_MAX_AUTH_TOKEN_LENGTH to libpq/auth.h
- e21d6f297158 18.0 landed
-
Make SASL max message length configurable
- 6d16f9debae0 18.0 landed
-
jsonapi: fully initialize dummy lexer
- 41b023946dfd 18.0 landed
-
common/jsonapi: support libpq as a client
- 0785d1b8b2fa 18.0 landed
-
Remove fe_memutils from libpgcommon_shlib
- f1976df5eaf2 18.0 landed
-
Revert ECPG's use of pnstrdup()
- f0096ef13be2 13.17 landed
- 3557185538fe 14.14 landed
- 2de129b356bf 15.9 landed
- ee2997c678d8 16.5 landed
- e9e05c655069 17.0 landed
- 5388216f6adc 18.0 landed
-
Explicitly require password for SCRAM exchange
- adcdb2c8dda4 17.0 landed
-
Refactor SASL exchange to return tri-state status
- 24178e235ea5 17.0 landed
Hi Jacob, thank you for detailed explanation and links!
Am I right that classic OAuth flow "create user account based on a
token" is implemented using custom validators?
1) In pg_hba.conf set user to all and "delegate_ident_mapping=1"
"local all all oauth issuer=$issuer scope=$scope delegate_ident_mapping=1"
2) Write a custom validator that will "execute" in C `CREATE USER
token.name WITH token.listofOptions` after verification of a token.
On 25-04-21 19:57, Jacob Champion wrote:
> We have some options for dealing with them, since their documentation
> instructs clients to hardcode their API entry points instead of using
> discovery. (That makes it easy for us to figure out when we're talking
> to Google, and potentially switch to a quirks mode.)
What do you mean by "discovery"? OpenID link that returns endpoint?
Google has this link
https://accounts.google.com/.well-known/openid-configuration
OUTPUT:
{
"issuer": "https://accounts.google.com",
"authorization_endpoint":
"https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth",
"device_authorization_endpoint":
"https://oauth2.googleapis.com/device/code",
"token_endpoint": "https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token",
"userinfo_endpoint":
"https://openidconnect.googleapis.com/v1/userinfo",
"revocation_endpoint": "https://oauth2.googleapis.com/revoke",
"jwks_uri": "https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v3/certs",
............
}
Here it's described
https://developers.google.com/identity/openid-connect/openid-connect
> But! Before we do that: How do you intend to authorize tokens issued
> by Google? Last I checked, they still had no way to register an
> application-specific scope, making it very dangerous IMO to use a
> public flow [2].
I've also thought as Antonin about
https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v3/userinfo for verification
As I understand from [2], the current problem is security, Google
doesn't want to add new scopes.
--
Best wishes,
Ivan Kush
Tantor Labs LLC