Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>,
Beena Emerson <memissemerson@gmail.com>
Cc: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-11-15T00:53:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2017/11/15 8:13, David Rowley wrote: > So some sort of hierarchical structure of the partition hierarchy > would need to be stored in the Append node and then you'd need to > search at each level, and then somehow match the results up to the > subpaths that you have in the Append. Although, I'm still not sure > this is the best way to go about this. I think we should try to use PartitionDispatch stuff for this somehow, just like get_partition_for_tuple() does, although I haven't thought very hard whether that infrastructure would be useful as is. Thanks, Amit
Commits
-
Initialize ExprStates once in run-time partition pruning
- 1957f8dabf8d 11.0 landed
-
Add bms_prev_member function
- 5c0675215e15 11.0 landed
-
Support partition pruning at execution time
- 499be013de65 11.0 landed
-
Document partprune.c a little better
- 971d7ddbe19a 11.0 landed
-
Fix crash in pg_replication_slot_advance
- 6f1d723b6359 11.0 cited
-
Add parallel-aware hash joins.
- 1804284042e6 11.0 cited
-
Fix typo.
- 487a0c1518af 11.0 cited
-
Allow --with-bonjour to work with non-macOS implementations of Bonjour.
- 9b9cb3c4534d 11.0 cited
-
Mention need for --no-inc-recursive in rsync command
- 2c74e6c1dcc5 11.0 cited